I am Article Layout

Now Reading: With great power comes great responsibility: tech and its complex relationship with ESG

Table of contents

Select your investor profile:

This content is only for the selected type of investor.

US Offshore Institutions & Sub-Advisory
By clicking on your segment you acknowledge that you have fully understood and accepted the terms and conditions

The technology sector’S esg credentials

December 2023
Marketing Material

With great power comes great responsibility: tech and its complex relationship with ESG

Having enjoyed a strong rally, technology stocks are now a key feature of both active and passive equity portfolios. This means understanding their ESG credentials has never been more important.

Written by
TSANG Daegal
Daegal Tsang
Senior Investment Manager
Marie Dumas
Marie Dumas
Client Portfolio Manager
Steve Freedman
Stephen Freedman
Head of research and sustainability, Thematic Equities

Table of contents

  1. 01
    Overview
  2. 02
    Integrity and safety of products and services
  3. 03
    Corporate governance
  4. 04
    Environmental footprint vs handprint
  5. 05
    Technology in society
  6. 06
    Conclusion
01

Overview

Over the past 25 years, information and communication technology (ICT) has transformed both the economy and society. More than 5 billion people, or over two thirds of the global population, have access to the Internet,1 while three-quarters of the world now own a mobile phone.2

This vast, dynamic digital ecosystem has given birth to new industries, like social media, and revolutionised existing ones, such as finance, via innovations including digital banking and payments.

ICT's march won't end there. Continued advances in fundamental technologies, in particular semiconductors and networking infrastructure, are now giving rise to breakthroughs in artificial intelligence (AI). This will enable the USD23 trillion ICT industry to become even more influential, affecting sectors as diverse as retail, healthcare and industrials.3

This is inevitably transforming investment portfolios, too. 

Technology companies account for an increasingly large part of investors’ holdings, irrespective of whether those assets are passively or actively managed. To those old enough to have experienced the dot.com boom and bust, this may stir uncomfortable memories. Yet there are arguably more problematic aspects to the tech sector's rise. Chief among them is the idea that tech companies also adhere to the highest environmental, social and governance (ESG) standards.

Indeed, tech stocks represent an even bigger slice of ESG-aligned portfolios: the S&P 500 index’s tech sector makes up the largest allocation in many popular ESG funds.4

At first glance, the ICT sector's strong ESG credentials are easy to rationalise. Many large companies in the industry have low carbon footprints while the sector is also home to firms developing products and services that contribute to the building of a more sustainable economy.

But that's not to say ESG investors can afford to be complacent. The tech sector's dynamism means that its ESG credentials will also be in flux. 

All of which means it is more important than ever for investors to keep abreast of the ESG risks and opportunities emerging within the ICT industry at large.

ESG considerations for tech companies are diverse and complex. They fall into two broad categories:

  • Material financial risks and opportunities for the tech sector, or issues that can have an impact on the bottom line. These issues can adversely affect companies if managed poorly or be turned into a competitive advantage for those taking a leading role in addressing them.
  • Positive impact of the tech sector on the environment or society through its products and services.
By understanding the evolution of ESG within tech, we believe investors can better distinguish leaders from laggards, allocate capital more appropriately, and engage with tech companies to achieve greater positive outcomes.
02

Integrity and safety of products and services

Product quality and safety

It is hard to overstate the scale and the impact of certain gigantic online platforms.

Today, Apple has an installed base of more than 2 billion iPhones and iPads globally. More than 3 billion people use one of Meta’s social media products (Facebook, Instagram or WhatsApp) daily, while Google is estimated to perform over 8 billion searches every day.5

From e-commerce to social media and beyond, the emergence of these huge digital platforms over the last three decades, as well as the reliance by companies on increasingly sophisticated AI algorithms, means that product and platform design decisions can have a profound impact on consumers, users and even society at large.

This also applies to non-consumer facing companies like software firms SAP, Salesforce, Adobe and ServiceNow whose cloud software platforms power hundreds of thousands of businesses globally. Small and start-up companies, in particular, benefit from access to leading-edge technologies through the cloud at prices which they would not have been able to afford traditionally thus lowering spending on internal IT infrastructure.

Material financial risks and opportunities: As the scrutiny of consumers and policymakers intensifies, so too do the regulatory and legal risks ICT companies face.

Social media has the potential to build communities and improve social interaction, but excessive reliance on digital devices and online platforms can result in issues such as excessive screen time, addiction and cyberbullying.

For example, in the US, parent groups, school districts and individual states are suing a number of social media platforms over the mental health struggles of children. While Section 230 of the 1996 US Communications Decency Act shields them from legal liability for user-generated content, the claimants argue the platforms and their algorithms are akin to a faulty product.6

Legal matters aside, platforms run reputational risk if they are perceived to breach ethical standards. While regulations are not comprehensive in addressing these concerns, self-regulation by companies is crucial.

Companies operating in social media must take proactive steps to protect their business and reputation by implementing measures that mitigate addiction risks, prioritise online safety, establish reporting mechanisms for harmful content, cooperate with authorities to address abuse and support mental well-being.

Meta, for example, has developed more than 30 features to support teenagers and families on its applications.

Ensuring physical safety is another priority. In 2016, Samsung lost an estimated USD1 billion after having to replace 2.5 million devices it recalled because of the risk of exploding batteries.

Yet these risks pale in comparison to the potential threats presented by unchecked development of artificial intelligence (AI).

The rapid emergence and exponential adoption of generative AI applications generate a variety of opportunities but also new risks, many of which are not fully appreciated.

Generative AI offers the advantages of creative content generation, automation of tasks, personalised user experiences and improved decision-making. But it also makes it easier to create malware or deepfakes that could affect a company’s operations or its product integrity.

Governments are starting to introduce rules concerning the provision of AI technology, with the European Union’s AI Act being the most comprehensive7, and US President Joe Biden’s Executive Order on AI the most recent.8

Tech companies developing AI solutions must beware of this shifting regulatory landscape. While regulations may contribute to increasing trust in AI among the public, they can also create the risk of financial and reputational damage in case of rule breaches and non-compliance.

We believe establishing best practices in the responsible development and deployment of AI is crucial for companies in the IT sector to maintain leadership.

In July, a group of seven companies, including Alphabet, Meta and Microsoft, established best practices in the field of AI. They made a commitment to share relevant information among themselves and with governments and researchers. Their principles encompass prioritising security, ensuring transparency with the public and conducting thorough internal product testing prior to public release.

Data security and privacy

Material financial risks and opportunities: With the average cost of “megabreaches” – incidents that involve the loss of least 10 million records – hitting USD400 million per breach, data security and increasing regulation are among the important ESG-related risks facing the tech industry.9 

Fig. 1 - Compromises on the rise
Publicly reported data compromises* by US companies
data compromises
* data compromises include data breaches, data exposures and data leaks. Source: Identity Theft Resource Center, 2022 Data Breach Report.

Tech companies that rely heavily on user or consumer data are particularly vulnerable to data breaches, as they could damage the firm’s reputation and lead to a loss of market share.

Take the 2017 data breach at Equifax, a leading consumer credit reporting company. While the firm may not technically belong to the ICT sector, it has a business model that relies heavily on data, demonstrating how serious the effects can be. After its data on almost 150 million US consumers was leaked publicly online, Equifax was fined USD275 million by the Federal Trade Commission and ordered to set up a USD300 million fund for victim compensation.10

Similarly, a breach suffered by Yahoo in 2013 almost derailed the Internet group’s takeover by Verizon, which ended up cutting USD350 million from its original offer.11 

Data privacy has also become an increasingly important ESG issue for tech companies, and not just for the firms that implement more stringent privacy practices. 

The fact is that changes in one company's policies to protect customers can have a material impact on other businesses within the supply chain. Take Apple. It changed its policy in 2021 to require consumers to opt in for data tracking by third-party apps on its iOS platform. This subsequently reduced advertising sales for a number of major companies, including many in tech and communications.

Positive impact: Certain tech companies can help other businesses mitigate cyber security risks. For example, AI-enabled smart security intelligence and automation management solutions such as those provided by Palo Alto Networks reduce the time needed to detect and counter cyber attacks to hours and minutes from days or weeks. That such services will be in increasing demand is not in doubt. In the third quarter of 2023, the frequency of ransomware attacks nearly doubled over the same period last year.12 The US Securities and Exchange Commission, meanwhile, has unveiled a new rule requiring public companies to issue periodic risk management, strategy and governance reports on cybersecurity risks, as well as to disclose material security breach incidents within four business days.

03

Corporate governance

Ownership structure

Material financial risks and opportunities: A common corporate governance red flag among tech companies is the existence of dual-class shares. In general, one class of shares, often exclusive to the founders of a company or a select group chosen early on, carries greater voting rights than the class of shares available to subsequent shareholders.

The rationale for having multiple classes of shares is to allow founders, executives, or other key stakeholders to retain control and make strategic decisions without being overly influenced by short-term shareholder interests. This structure provides stability and continuity, allowing companies to focus on their long-term goals and vision despite market pressures.

However, such structures can also create a wedge between ownership and voting rights and could prevent active oversight of the company’s founder or chief executive officer.

Dual-class shares exist at tech giants such as Meta, and were blamed by investors for the company's lack of strategic direction. A decline in the firm's stock price and public criticism of its leadership by activist shareholders finally led Meta’s to refocus on profitability. This was rewarded by investors, with its share price having recovered. 

The Council for Institutional Investors has adopted a nuanced position on dual-class stock.13 While recognising that it can offer some stability during a company's early stages, they recommend unifying the two classes within a maximum of seven years. This recommendation follows academic evidence indicating that dual-class stock, while valuable in the initial period post-IPO, typically has a negative performance impact beyond a certain timeframe.14

Business ethics

Material financial risks and opportunities: The tech industry has always been prone to business ethics controversies. Take instances of anti-competitive behaviour. In perhaps the most famous tech-related antitrust case, a US court ruled in 2001 that Microsoft had illegally maintained a monopoly in the personal computer market, which forced the company to modify its business practices.

In Europe, it was ordered to pay a fine of more than USD600 million for similar charges. Once all the investigations were finished, Microsoft had to share its software interfaces with third-party companies.

Regulators are also taking a proactive stance to prevent anti-competitive behaviours and foster competition in the tech and communications sector. The EU’s new Digital Markets Act, for example, aims to prevent large tech platforms from abusing their market power.

Bribery and corruption are business ethics topics that also remain relevant in the sector. For instance, telecom giant Ericsson paid a fine of over USD1 billion in 2019 after admitting to bribery and other wrongdoing in multiple countries. In 2022, the company was forced to pay a further penalty of USD200 million for breaching the 2019 prosecution deal on cooperation and disclosure provisions.

04

Environmental footprint vs handprint

Negative environmental impact

The tech sector is responsible for less than 3 per cent of global carbon emissions. Its footprint is smaller than that of more heavily polluting sectors, such as electricity, transport and manufacturing.

Yet with tech accounting for a growing share of the economy, its environmental footprint is expanding too. The number of Internet users worldwide has doubled and global digital traffic has grown 12-fold since 2010.15

The digital system contribution to global emissions is estimated to increase to 14 per cent by 2040 – equivalent to that of the United States – unless any changes are made.

The industry is encountering a challenge where gains in efficiency, resulting in reduced resource usage per unit of production, may be counterbalanced by increased consumption of the same product. This phenomenon is commonly referred to as the Jevons paradox.16

As a result, the increase in resource usage by tech companies has to be viewed in the context of resource savings in aggregate across the entire value chain as new technology is adopted.

Tech companies are not blind to their environmental footprint. Indeed, multiple efforts are underway to strengthen their positive handprint by reducing emissions and the use of natural resources.

The challenge also goes beyond greenhouse gas emissions. For example, data centres which power cloud computing require not only vast amounts of electricity but also large quantities of natural resources such as water.

They typically require about 3-5 million gallons of water per day, the same amount a city of 30,000-50,000 needs, to operate smoothly.17

Similarly, water represents a key restrictive factor for sustainably expanding the semiconductor industry.

A study of 27 semiconductor companies shows it takes an average of 2.58m3 of water and 361.3 kwh of energy, and emissions of 263.9 kg of CO2 equivalent to make a single 8-inch wafer.18

All of this is not to say that tech companies are blind to their environmental footprint. Indeed, multiple efforts are underway to strengthen their positive handprint by reducing emissions and the use of natural resources.

Many large tech companies are also investing in carbon reduction initiatives such as carbon capture projects.

In 2022, Alphabet, Meta, Stripe, Shopify and McKinsey Sustainability partnered and committed to investing nearly USD1 billion to accelerate the development of technological carbon removal.

The data centre industry, for its part, is trying to capitalise on economies of scale. Computing workloads in “hyperscale” data centres – which typically have at least 5,000 servers and 10,000 square feet – are almost five times more energy efficient and six times more water efficient than traditional data centres.19

Telecom firms, for their part, are turning to AI to modernise and optimise all their network nodes to improve performance and achieve efficiency savings, especially as energy generation and provision can account for as much as 60 per cent of their annual operating expenses.20

Positive impact: Tech firms play a crucial role in accelerating the clean energy transition and improving energy and resource efficiency. Without the tech sector’s expertise and products, other energy-intensive industries would not be able to decarbonise.

Semiconductors, for example, are key components for clean technologies and the contribution of microelectronics to energy transition is hard to overstate.

From solar panels to wind turbines, smart grid to electric vehicles and industrial automation, these tiny chips harness, convert, transfer and store renewable energy as electricity, and help it move through the electric grid with minimum loss of power.

Fig. 2 - Transition tech
How semiconductors power the energy transition
semiconductor-use_797px
Source: Pictet Asset Management

The number of power semiconductors used in the global renewable energy market is expected to grow at a compound annual rate of 8-10 per cent in the five years to 2027.21

Specifically, semiconductors that are designed to optimise power conversion for maximum energy efficiency not only reduce heat production and cooling requirements but also help lower energy wastage and CO2 emissions.

Almost half of the semiconductors and equipment companies surveyed by MSCI generated revenue from products and services that contribute to at least one clean tech activities, such as renewable energy or energy efficiency.22

Tech firms are helping reduce our reliance on natural resources in other ways.

Those that develop 3D design and product management software help businesses reduce resource consumption in areas ranging from construction and manufacturing to services.

Hardware and software solutions for e-commerce also yield positive environmental benefits – e-commerce is estimated to cut the carbon footprint of retailers by nearly three times and reduce traffic by a factor of 4-9 times compared with brick-and-mortar counterparts.23

Another source of resource efficiency gains arises from the adoption of cloud computing.

As organisations shift from running their IT systems on their own on-site servers to using the large data centres provided by cloud service providers, improvements in energy efficiency can be considerable.

A 2018 study by WSP and Microsoft found efficiency gains ranging from 22 to 93 per cent, with smaller organisations estimated to benefit the most.24 Once the reliance on renewable energy used to power data centres was factored in, the life-cycle CO2 emissions reduction ranged from 72 to 98 per cent vs on-premise computing.

05

Technology in society

Human capital

For tech companies, human capital considerations are business critical. They are essential to attract and retain talented employees in intermediate to high-paying jobs within the industry. It is also an area where tech companies can deliver value by helping customers deal with labour supply shortages in other segments of the economy through automation.
Fig. 3 - Sorry, no one available
Labour shortage indicator in the EU (%)
labour shortage updated
Source: European Commission (2023), “Employment and Social Developments in Europe 2023”

Material financial risks and opportunities: In recent years, several flagship tech companies have been involved in controversies, which had financial and reputational consequences.

In June 2022, after five years of litigation, Alphabet, Google’s parent company, paid USD118 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that alleged it had discriminated against female employees and violated California’s Equal Pay Act.

Similarly, Uber paid USD10 million to settle a class-action lawsuit with 400 female and minority software engineers in 2018.

While the financial impact of such settlements may be small for a company like Google or Uber, the reputational damage on it as an employer may be more significant in industries that are among the most affected by labour and skills shortages.

The importance of talented employees at technology firms means that companies have to be mindful of employees’ preferences and ethical perspective when determining corporate strategy.

For example, in 2018, Alphabet’s employees objected to the company’s involvement in “Project Maven”, a US Department of Defense programme to develop and deploy AI technologies, because of concerns about the potential use of AI in warfare.

After several protests and employee resignations, the company abandoned the contract and set up a new set of ethical principles regarding AI, which are now viewed as industry leading.25

Positive impact: Technology firms can also help other industries deal with the changing world of work. Labour markets have become tighter in recent years as a result of aging in developed countries, low labour market participation of certain population groups and the reshoring of production.

This has been compounded by a surprising and rapid withdrawal of people from segments of the workforce since the global pandemic, or otherwise known as the great resignation.26

Tech companies - such as those involved in automation, robotics or AI - are well placed to alleviate the problem as their products can help raising the productivity of the existing human workforce.

Human rights

Material financial risks and opportunities: The ICT industry typically subcontracts production of components. This practice shifts risks from companies’ own operations to their supply chain.

With a significant amount of subcontracting occurring in the Asia-Pacific region, issues such as labour conditions at subcontractors come to the fore. For example, Hon Hai Precision Industry – the Taiwanese assembler of iPhone and the world’s biggest contract electronics manufacturer also known as Foxconn, has been under fire for labour conditions at its Chinese factories for over a decade. Areas of concern range from employee welfare, factory unrest, violations of employment laws, as well as accidents.

This may well have contributed to the underperformance of Foxconn shares relative to regional and global technology indices since 2010.27

Positive impact: At the same time, the ICT industry can offer solutions to better manage human rights risks in companies’ supply chains. Supply chain sustainability software is emerging as a promising growth area in managing supply chain risks as they allow users to onboard and track suppliers more effectively, better manage certification-related processes and set compliance requirements.

Access to knowledge and health

Material financial risk and opportunities: Digital inclusion brings new risks and challenges brought on by the ease of access to and rapid dissemination of data. Technological products have the potential to contain and contribute to biased information or even misinformation leading to overall societal harms.

AI algorithms can unintentionally amplify false information by reinforcing biases in source datasets, aligning with specific agendas, and prioritizing sensational content for user engagement.

In some instances, Tech giants, in particular social media platforms, have also been criticised for accommodating government pressure seeking to censor dissenting views. To address these risks, governments and leading companies are implementing regulations and ethical practices.

Measures such as transparency requirements, algorithmic audits, and responsible AI development guidelines are being adopted to mitigate the impact of misinformation and bias.

However, regulations are not necessarily consistent globally such as the US Communications Decency Act which does not hold any internet media company liable for the content posted on its site compared to the recent EU Digital Markets Act which does for large internet platforms. This puts the onus, therefore, back on companies on how they wish to address the issue. Prominent tech companies like Meta, Google, and Microsoft have voluntarily agreed to safeguards to address these risks.

Transparency also plays a crucial role in AI models. Lack of transparency hinders other businesses from determining if they can safely build applications relying on commercial foundation models. It also affects academics relying on these models for research, policymakers creating effective regulations, and consumers understanding model limitations or seeking to redress for any harms caused.

The Foundation Model AI Index evaluates the transparency of these models and can ultimately assess their leadership.28 Leading foundational AI model providers will have to provide customers with greater assurances around data quality and governance. Google, for example, has now committed to indemnifying customers against copyright infringement claims when using its generative AI products.29

Positive impact: Notwithstanding legitimate concerns around product safety - including privacy, security and mental health impacts that may arise - it is undeniable that innovative technologies can also make a valuable societal contribution by removing or alleviating obstacles that limit access to basic types of infrastructure.

Three distinctive areas stand out:

  • Plugging the digital infrastructure gap. Access to telecommunication and the internet can be a game changer in fighting poverty and promoting economic empowerment. It should help bridge the infrastructure gap, estimated at USD15 trillion by 2040. 
  • Education. Information technology is already contributing to democratising education. The advent of online education, in particular massive open online courses (MOOCs), has opened academic content to a much broader audience - DIY access to knowledge across many fields is now possible for individuals without access to formal education channels. The impact can be substantial particularly in developing countries where the levels of “learning poverty” -- the number of 10-year old children who cannot read and understand a simple story by the end of primary school – stands at 53 per cent for low- and middle-income countries.30
  • Advancing health outcomes. Health records and treatment monitoring have been simplified through the use of connected devices such as wearables and virtual clinical tests. AI tools help recognise anomalies and improve diagnoses and are also expected to accelerate drug development. In 2021, more than 100 drug and biologic applications submitted to the US Food and Drug Agency included AI/machine learning components, compared with 14 in 2020.31 Robotics’ innovations have enabled surgeons to perform complex procedures with enhanced precision and accuracy, leading to better surgical outcomes while reducing healthcare costs.32
06

Conclusion

As tech permeates every aspect of our lives and grows in its economic relevance, the ICT industry has developed an increasingly complex interaction with environmental and social challenges.

We believe that by better understanding these ESG dynamics -- both risks and opportunities – and incorporating such insights beyond traditional financial analysis can investors capitalise on a diverse set of opportunities from the tech transformation.

By better understanding these ESG dynamics -- both risks and opportunities – and incorporating such insights beyond traditional financial analysis can investors capitalise on a diverse set of opportunities from the tech transformation.

[1] https://unsdg.un.org/latest/stories/wired-good-digital-connectivity-sustainable-future
[2] https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/2022/11/24/ff22-mobile-phone-ownership/
[3] The IT and Communication Services sectors of the MSCI All Country World Index, data as of 30.11.2023
[4] https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/18/alphabet-was-the-most-widely-held-stock-for-the-largest-esg-funds.html
[5] Apple Sept 23 earnings call, Meta Sept 23 earnings slides, https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/google-search-statistics
[6] https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/14/23960956/meta-google-tiktok-snap-social-media-addiction-lawsuits
[7] www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence
[8] www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2023/10/30/executive-order-on-the-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence
[9] www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach
[10] www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2019/07/equifax-pay-575-million-part-settlement-ftc-cfpb-states-related-2017-data-breach
[11] https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/03/technology/yahoo-hack-3-billion-users.html
[12] https://www.corvusinsurance.com/blog/q3-ransomware-report?utm_campaign=FY23-Q4-Quarterly%20Ransomware%20Report&utm_source=ransomware%20blog&utm_medium=press
[13] Council of Institutional Investors, Dual-Class Stock (2021); https://www.cii.org/dualclass_stock
[14] Cremers, Lauterbach and Pajuste (2018): https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3062895
[15] UNEP
[16] www.oecd-forum.org/posts/the-jevons-paradox-and-rebound-effect-are-we-implementing-the-right-energy-and-climate-change-policies
[17] https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/04/25/data-centers-drought-water-use/
[18] Wang, Q. et al (2023) Environmental data and facts in the semiconductor manufacturing industry: An unexpected high water and energy consumption situation, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watcyc.2023.01.004
[19] https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/abfba1
[20] https://www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/wiki/energy-efficiency-2/
[21] https://www.reportlinker.com/p06244226/Power-Semiconductors-in-the-Global-Renewable-Energy-Market-Report-Trends-Forecast-and-Competitive-Analysis.html?utm_source=GNW
[22] MSCI, Industry Report, Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment, December 2022.
[23] https://www.oliverwyman.de/content/dam/oliver-wyman/v2/publications/2021/apr/is-ecommerce-good-for-europe.pdf
[24] https://www.wsp.com/en-us/insights/microsoft-cloud-computing-environmental-benefit-study
[25] https://ai.google/responsibility/principles/
[26] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_3704
[27] Covering period 30.06.2010 and 30.06.2023
[28] https://hai.stanford.edu/news/introducing-foundation-model-transparency-index
[29] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning/protecting-customers-with-generative-ai-indemnification
[30] https://elearningindustry.com/how-can-developing-countries-leverage-elearning-platforms
[31] Liu Q. et all (2022), “Landscape Analysis of the Application of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Regulatory Submissions for Drug Development From 2016 to 2021”, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Volume 113, Issue 4, 771-774. https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpt.2668
[32] For instance, a recent study reported that a robotic surgery reduces the chance of patient readmission by half and revealed a 80 per cent decline in the prevalence of blood clots, which is a significant cause of health decline and morbidity. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220515/Robotic-surgery-reduces-readmissions-benefits-patients-overall-recovery.aspx

Related articles
ESG ratings under the microscope
ESG corporate ratings are redrawing the financial landscape, yet investors often struggle to interpret them.
Caroline Reyl, Stephen Freedman, Faisel Syed
October 2023
The investment implications of AI
How generative AI has re-ignited investor enthusiasm for tech stocks.
John Gladwyn
September 2023
The rise of generative AI
Generative AI has the potential to change the way we live and work and could soon redraw the landscape for investors in technology stocks.
Anjali Bastianpillai
May 2023

About

Daegal Tsang

TSANG Daegal

Daegal Tsang joined the Pictet Robotics strategy as a Senior Investment Manager in 2022. Daegal has been part of Pictet Asset Management since 2011 and previously worked as a Senior Investment Manager based in Pictet’s London office, providing coverage of the global technology sector for Pictet’s Developed Markets Equity investment team. Daegal started his career at Morgan Grenfell Asset Management (part of Deutsche Bank) in 1994 as a US Technology sector analyst and subsequently a US equities portfolio manager. In 2000 Daegal joined Morgan Stanley as a global technology equities specialist salesperson within the International Equities Division, a role he continued at subsequently at Arete Research in 2007 and Berenberg Bank in 2010. Daegal graduated from Oxford University in 1994 with a degree in Mathematics. He is also a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) charterholder.

About

Marie Dumas

Marie Dumas

Marie Dumas joined Pictet Asset Management in 2023 as a Client Portfolio Manager in the Thematic Equities team, focusing on the Security, Digital and Robotics strategies. 

Prior to Pictet, Marie worked for five years at Dassault Systèmes in France and the United States. Marie developed her technology knowledge while working in Dassault Systèmes' M&A division. Then, in Investor Relations, she promoted the company’s sustainable business strategy. Marie holds a master’s degree in Corporate Finance from EDHEC Business School and passed the Paris Bar.

About

Stephen Freedman

Steve Freedman

Stephen Freedman joined Pictet Asset Management in 2019 and is Head of research and sustainability, Thematic Equities. He also chairs the Thematic Advisory Boards. Before joining Pictet, Stephen was at UBS Wealth Management, where he most recently served as head of Sustainable Investing Solutions for the Americas, based in New York. Prior to that he served in various Investment Strategy roles, including head of Thematic Investing Strategy and head of Tactical Asset Allocation. He started his career with UBS in Zurich in 1998 as an economist and public policy analyst. Since 2018, he has been teaching environmental finance at New York University.  He was also the founding co-chair of the Columbia University Seminar on Sustainable Finance from 2016 to 2019.  Stephen holds a Doctorate (PhD) and a Masters in economics from the University of St. Gallen. He is a CFA charterholder and earned the FRM designation from the Global Association of Risk Professionals.

Important legal information

This marketing material is issued by Pictet Asset Management (Europe) S.A.. It is neither directed to, nor intended for distribution or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of, or domiciled or located in, any locality, state, country or jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation. The latest version of the fund‘s prospectus, Pre-Contractual Template (PCT) when applicable, Key Information Document (KID), annual and semi-annual reports must be read before investing. They are available free of charge in English on www.assetmanagement.pictet or in paper copy at Pictet Asset Management (Europe) S.A., 6B, rue du Fort Niedergruenewald, L-2226 Luxembourg, or at the office of the fund local agent, distributor or centralizing agent if any.

The KID is also available in the local language of each country where the compartment is registered. The prospectus, the PCT when applicable, and the annual and semi-annual reports may also be available in other languages, please refer to the website for other available languages. Only the latest version of these documents may be relied upon as the basis for investment decisions.

The summary of investor rights (in English and in the different languages of our website) is available here and at www.assetmanagement.pictet under the heading "Resources", at the bottom of the page.

The list of countries where the fund is registered can be obtained at all times from Pictet Asset Management (Europe) S.A., which may decide to terminate the arrangements made for the marketing of the fund or compartments of the fund in any given country.

The information and data presented in this document are not to be considered as an offer or solicitation to buy, sell or subscribe to any securities or financial instruments or services.

Information, opinions and estimates contained in this document reflect a judgment at the original date of publication and are subject to change without notice. The management company has not taken any steps to ensure that the securities referred to in this document are suitable for any particular investor and this document is not to be relied upon in substitution for the exercise of independent judgment. Tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances of each investor and may be subject to change in the future. Before making any investment decision, investors are recommended to ascertain if this investment is suitable for them in light of their financial knowledge and experience, investment goals and financial situation, or to obtain specific advice from an industry professional.

The value and income of any of the securities or financial instruments mentioned in this document may fall as well as rise and, as a consequence, investors may receive back less than originally invested.

The investment guidelines are internal guidelines which are subject to change at any time and without any notice within the limits of the fund's prospectus. The mentioned financial instruments are provided for illustrative purposes only and shall not be considered as a direct offering, investment recommendation or investment advice. Reference to a specific security is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Effective allocations are subject to change and may have changed since the date of the marketing material.

Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future performance. Performance data does not include the commissions and fees charged at the time of subscribing for or redeeming shares.

Any index data referenced herein remains the property of the Data Vendor. Data Vendor Disclaimers are available on assetmanagement.pictet in the “Resources” section of the footer. This document is a marketing communication issued by Pictet Asset Management and is not in scope for any MiFID II/MiFIR requirements specifically related to investment research. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision and it should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in any products or services offered or distributed by Pictet Asset Management.

Pictet AM has not acquired any rights or license to reproduce the trademarks, logos or images set out in this document except that it holds the rights to use any entity of the Pictet group trademarks. For illustrative purposes only.

Your regional office

New York

712 Fifth Avenue 25th Floor New York, NY 10019

Telephone : +1 212 237 3190

Contact us

Representative registered with Foreside Fund Services, LLC which is not affiliated with Pictet AM or its affiliates

Marketing Material. All forms of investment involve risk. The value of investments and the income derived from them is not guaranteed and it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the original amount invested.
Pictet Asset Management 2024. All rights reserved. Please read our terms and conditions before accessing this website.
Some of the photographs published on this website have been taken by Stéphane Couturier, Magnus Arrevad, Lundi 13, Phovea, 13Photo, Magnum Photos, Club Photo Pictet.
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies to enhance user navigation and to collect statistical data. To refuse the use of cookies, change your settings or for more information, please click on the following link: Cookies policy. By continuing to browse this website, you accept the use of cookies for the above purposes.
Customize