I am Article Layout


Select your investor profile:

This content is only for the selected type of investor.

Individual investor?

Quest global equities

April 2020

Quest: building a resilient equity portfolio

An understanding of "factors" and "styles" can help equity investors secure better returns over the long run - but only if that knowledge is deployed judiciously.

Stone walls, towers, moats and heavy wooden portcullises. Medieval monarchs and lords certainly knew how to build strong defences. They successfully deployed several different types of fortification to protect their wealth.

The investment community could learn a thing or two from the nobles of the middle ages. While most investors appreciate that protecting capital during the bad times can lead to better returns over the long run, few understand what it takes to build a genuinely resilient portfolio of stocks.

In fact, many of the conservative equity strategies currently popular with investors have the same glaring vulnerability – they rely on just one line of defence.

Take for example “low volatility” equity – one of the fastest-growing strategies. Funds that are referenced to the MSCI Minimum Volatility Index often invest in companies that pay high dividends in sectors such as utilities, staples or real estate. 

These firms are considered stable investments also because they often behave like fixed income securities. Investing in low volatility strategies has worked well in recent years as bond yields have hit historic lows. But dividend-paying companies are unlikely to be as reliable in future. That’s because most of these firms have consistently increased debt to fund dividends and share buybacks, weakening their balance sheets (see Fig. 1). So when business conditions deteriorate, as they are doing rapidly right now, dividends are sure to be sacrificed, weighing on the returns of "low-volatility" stocks.

Fig. 1 - Dividends at risk as debts mount
Cumulative debt (in USD bln) since 1998 of low volatility companies and top quartile 4P companies, ex-financials
dividends at risk chart

Top 4P companies are those which rank in the top quartile in our Quest Global Equities strategy's 4P (Profitability, Protection, Prudence, Price) investment screen. Low volatility companies are those in the top quartile of our Protection screen. Source: Pictet Asset Management, data covering period 31.12.1997 - 31.12.2019

Investing in funds that target “value" stocks, or those which trade at an attractive discount to a firm’s intrinsic value, is another popular "style" approach. 

In fact, it is one of the oldest equity investment strategies, pioneered in 1930s by the renowned British-American investor Benjamin Graham, a mentor to Warren Buffett.

Conceived as a way to help investors avoid overpaying for stocks, the approach has proved particularly fruitful during periods of modest economic growth. 

However, cheap stocks aren't necessarily the bargains they appear to be. Relying exclusively on this investment style carries risks.

Take financials stocks, a staple for "value" investors.

Using the MSCI Value index, which tracks large and mid cap securities with value style characteristics across 23 developed markets countries, it is clear that value investors have had an overweight stance in the financial sector relative to the benchmark MSCI World index (see Fig. 2).

Shares in financial companies have suffered disproportionately as the coronavirus outbreak spread globally. And for two reasons. First, the sharp slowdown in economic growth will inevitably cause a spike in banks' non-performing loans. Second, deep cuts to official interest rates will further dent bank profit margins.

Financials are not the only problem area for "value" enthusiasts. So too are energy stocks, another favourite with such investors. 

Energy shares have endured a 30 per cent-plus decline due to a supply glut in oil markets. A recovery looks a remote prospect. Making matters worse, "value" investors have also missed out on technology stocks' long winning streak: the digital economy has thrived as lockdowns have taken effect worldwide.

Fig. 2 - Exposed: single style/factor investing reduces diversification
Active sector weights relative to MSCI World Index
Active sector weights relative to MSCI World Index

MSCI Minimum Volatility, Quality and Value indices are part of MSCI Factor Indexes, which represent the return of factors, or common stock characteristics that have historically earned a persistent premium over the long term. Source: MSCI, Bloomberg, Pictet Asset Management, data as of 02.04.2020

As these examples show, equity funds that focus on a single factor or style expose investors to uncomfortably high levels of risk.

Not only can single factor strategies concentrate investments in overpriced stocks, they are also not flexible enough to adapt to sudden shifts in macroeconomic conditions, such as a collapse in growth or unprecedented monetary and fiscal stimulus.

As a result, they can suffer disproportionate losses when markets turn sour.

4P framework: towards building a resilient portfolio

To minimise these risks, and build a more resilient portfolio, our investment strategy takes a flexible approach. It invests across styles and factors, tilting allocations according to prevailing economic and financial conditions. The process we follow gauges a firm’s investibility along four dimensions: profitability, prudence, protection and price – what we call our “4P” factor framework.

Fig. 3 - 4P at a glance
4p framework infographic

Source: Pictet Asset Management

The Profitability factor is our gauge of a business's strengths and competitive advantage. Companies that rank highly on this measure have, among other things, steady earnings growth, low operational leverage and high cash generation. Our research shows that firms with a strong track record of profitability tend to have more reliable and predictable earnings than firms whose stock valuations are in part based on lofty expectations for profit growth.

Prudence is the factor that captures a company’s operational and financial risks. In our framework, prudent firms are those that exhibit a lower risk of default and expand organically rather than through acquisitions. We invest in businesses that can create and preserve shareholder value by pursuing manageable growth and maintaining a sound financial profile. We measure this by looking at the nature and stability of the company’s cash flows relative to its financial commitments, including interest, dividends or capital spending.

Our Protection metrics monitor how a firm behaves over the course of the economic cycle – the aim is to quantify systematic or company-specific risks. We are looking for companies that have sustainable business models and whose prospects are insensitive to shifts in economic cycles. At the same time, we also analyse a stock’s volatility and its correlation with other equities to understand how it might affect the risk-return profile of the overall portfolio.

Finally, we don’t want to overpay for our investments. Therefore, our Price screen incorporates several reliable valuation models that help us identify the most attractively-priced stocks. Without this screen, portfolio managers could overlook promising investments or choose stocks that risk a capital loss. As a result of this comprehensive approach, our portfolio has a defensive profile that encompasses large cap, quality, value and low volatility stocks.

Each of our four Ps represents a single line of defence that, when combined, produce an equity portfolio that better able to withstand market shocks.

Preserving capital with a multi-dimensional defensive approach is key to securing healthy returns over the long run.

Adapting to change

A distinctive feature of the 4P approach is that it's dynamic, not static as many smart beta strategies tend to be.

Our starting point is to evenly weight all the 4Ps when we screen stocks. In other words, the portfolio has equal exposure to each "P". 

We then change that allocation using fundamental analysis, basing our decisions on our understanding of economic and market trends and the momentum and valuation of each P.

For example, we were underweight the Protection factor after the Brexit vote in 2016, as valuations for stocks which scored strongly on this dimension reached unjustifiably stretched levels – a strategy that proved successful.

In 2019, we were overweight the Price factor as an economic slowdown encouraged investors to move away from high-growth companies in favour of value stocks.

More recently, due to the effects of the coronavirus outbreak, we have progressively reduced our overweight stance to Price.  

Currently, our allocation is equally weighted across all the 4Ps. We prefer companies that have strong and balanced 4P scores, most of which are from industries such as consumer staples, IT and industrials – a universe characterised by high quality and resilient corporate profits. We also like large cap companies which have reassuring characteristics for investors in times of crisis, such as better access to liquidity and robust balance sheets.

We are neither over- nor under-exposed to any one factor. Preserving capital in this way is key to securing healthy returns over the long run.

We believe our multi-dimensional approach, combined with the fundamentally-informed dynamic adjustment, provides a sound basis upon which we are able to build portfolios with balanced risks.

Preserving capital in this way is key to securing healthy returns over the long run.

As the lords and nobles of the Middle Ages would tell you, it’s crucial to have more than one line of defence.