Demystifying alternative investments

A close look at property highlights some of the problems investors face when assessing alternative investments. Property comes in two forms: a building site and the final construction. Owning a building site is much like owning stock in a high-growth company with the expectation that the return will come in the form of a capital gain. Meanwhile, the finished building broadly acts like a debt instrument, the main difference being that its coupons are called rents. So it’s not an alternative in the sense that it isn’t immune to the traditional driving forces of bonds and equities.

But that’s not to say property does not offer investors diversification. It can protect against inflation and has contractual cash flows that aren’t necessarily fully synchronised with traditional asset classes. 

a volatile universe

Comparing the range of long-term returns for alternative and traditional asset classes

Private equity is an asset class that gains from the fact that debt has tax advantages. It’s an investment best suited to long-term stable institutional pools of capital, like endowments and sovereign wealth funds, which can take advantage of the extra returns available as a trade-off for locking up money over long periods.

Elsewhere, there are infrastructure assets – such as toll roads, airports or hydro-electric projects. But because they’re typically contracts with the public sector, they end up mimicking the public bond market, albeit with lower liquidity and higher fees. Nor do they offer the prospect of equity-like capital gains.

Many investors are attracted to alternatives like artworks, wine, stamps, diamonds, rare cars etc. But these are, in fact, speculative assets. The decision to buy tends to be based on the expectation that someone will pay a higher price at a later date for something with no obvious intrinsic economic value. And they’re often hard to handle. Selling a portfolio of these assets can take many months and considerable legwork – all the while incurring significant insurance and storage costs.

Alternatives like artworks, wine, stamps, diamonds, rare cars etc. are, in fact, speculative assets.

As for commodities, not only do we not see them as alternatives, we don’t even regard them as long-term assets. There’s no evidence that commodity prices rise over time. In fact, technological improvements – be they more efficient machinery, better processes or something like the mid-20th century’s Green Revolution, when thanks to scientific innovation and technology, agricultural productivity rocketed – have generally contributed to a downward trend in long run commodity prices.

What’s more, commodities are often liabilities. Take timber. It generates no income, you have to pay to store and insure it and, over time, it rots. Forests, on the other hand, are assets. Investors can choose the pace at which trees are harvested and planted as well as the species mix, whether slow growing deciduous or fast evergreen.

Bullionaires

Gold price, dollars per ounce

Not because of its commodity characteristics, but because it acts as a proto-currency. It’s true that, as with other commodities, gold doesn’t generate an income and incurs storage and insurance costs. But it isn’t a wasting asset, doesn’t tarnish and has historically worked as a store of value. And in a time when yields across assets generally are wafer thin or even negative, gold’s lack of income generation stops being a mark against it.

Gold comes into its own when people start to worry about central banks using the printing press to erode away the value of currencies, as well as during times of political turmoil and war. People buy it as a safe haven. Today’s worries about North Korea, the erratic Trump presidency and central banks’ growing balance sheets underscore its attractions as a long-term investment.

Research has shown that it also works as a hedge against stocks during normal market conditions.¹ Which is to say that it works as a portfolio diversifier.