Supriya Menon, Senior Multi Asset Strategist, Andrew Cole, Head of Multi Asset London
Share this article
The private lending market is booming. That brings new investment opportunities – but also increased risks.
Illiquid leveraged loans increasingly found in mutual funds and ETFs
Risk is that, in its current shape, the market is largely untested in stress scenarios
Covenants have weakened, leverage has climbed
Private lending – once solely the domain of institutional investors – is now increasingly available to private investors. Mutual funds and Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) targeting leveraged loans have mushroomed in recent years. The appetite is such that Nest, the UK’s national workplace pension scheme, has called on fund managers to develop “affordable and innovative” private credit vehicles for the defined contribution (DC) retirement saving schemes.
The appeal of private debt is clear. In an era of near-zero interest rates, direct lending offers investors relatively high returns (including an income stream from coupons), combined with lower volatility than high yield bonds. What is more, the market has also become simply too big to ignore as companies that had previously borrowed from banks are now seeking funding directly from investors.
However, all investments come with risks – and in the case of private lending the market’s ability to weather periods of financial or economic turbulence is so far largely untested. It’s particularly worrying that issuers’ leverage is rising while investor protection is weakening. This could exacerbate defaults, with serious implications not only for investors, but also for companies that rely on such financing structures and potentially for the health of the wider economy. The fact that the private debt market is relatively illiquid is likely to amplify any sell-offs and could cause problems for ETFs and mutual funds in particular.
Investors considering making an allocation to private debt must also make sure that their eyes are wide open as to the risks.
Leverage boom
The private lending market is broadly made up of leveraged loans and private credit, with the latter pool including investments from collateralised loan obligations (CLOs) and senior loan funds.
FIGURE 1: private lending market in focus
Sources: Pictet Asset Management, S&P/LSTA Global Leveraged Loan index, Preqin
For investors, returns are a key attraction. One reason the market is growing particularly strongly now is rising US interest rates. As the US Federal Reserve increases borrowing costs, this has made the floating rates on leveraged loans more attractive to investors than the fixed coupons they would otherwise receive from high yield bonds.
Although the 10-year average annualised total return is still below that of listed high yield, leveraged loans have performed better when adjusted for volatility over that time frame. This is not only because their coupons rise in line with LIBOR but also because such assets sit higher up in a company's capital structure. They have also outperformed in absolute terms over 2018-to-date as rates have gone up.
Another aspect of the private market's growing appeal is that it's becoming deeper and more diverse asset class. A broader range of companies now borrow directly from non-bank entities, partly because regulation has forced the banking industry to scale back lending.
At the same time, companies of all stripes are borrowing more for strategic reasons. Rather than refinancing debt or recapitalising balance sheets, the majority of new leveraged loan issuance over the past five years was to fund mergers and acquisitions or leveraged buy-outs.1 (US M&A deals so far this year have totalled a record USD2.2 trillion).
FIGURE 2: record volumes
US issuance of leveraged loans, banks and institutional, USD billion
Source: Bloomberg
In the US, some USD1.5 trillion of leveraged loans were issued in 2017 – 71 per cent more than the average annual issuance over the previous five years (see chart). The first half of 2018 has been similarly strong. As 86 per cent of the market is in the US,2 we have largely focused our research on this region.
Less compensation...
Still, investors should tread carefully.
The first reason for caution is the fact that valuations – both for leveraged loans and for high yield – now provide little room for default and recovery. The extra yield, or spread, such assets offer over US government bonds has fallen sharply in recent years (see chart).
FIGURE 3: falling rewards
Excess spread adjusted for average default, recovery rates
Source: S&P/LSTA, Moody’s. Using 12-month trailing default rates and applying recovery rates of 40 per cent for high yield and 70 per cent for leveraged loans in line with historical averages. Data covering period 21.10.2012 – 07.08.2018.
The average spread at loan signing date has dropped to 383 basis points by mid-2018 from a peak of 473 basis points in March 2015.3
That matters. If defaults were to rise to 5.5 per cent from about 2 per cent currently – which would still be far short of the 10-15 per cent rates typically seen during recessions – and the recovery rate dropped to 50 per cent, the excess spread would be wiped out by the capital loss. In other words, it would take only a relatively modest deterioration in conditions for investors to lose all the additional compensation these assets are offering in exchange for increased risk and reduced liquidity.
More worrying still, the leveraged loan market tends to feature lower-rated borrowers, with the majority rated B, compared to BB in the high yield market.
The trend towards ever lower compensation for risk is evident across the credit market – internal rates of return (IRRs) on private credit funds have compressed in the face of rising capital inflows and increased competition for assets. Meanwhile, the spread on high-yield bonds have also narrowed significantly, a sign that markets are moving into the latter phases of the credit cycle.
...For more risk
Just as prospective compensation has deteriorated, so too has the credit quality of private debt instruments, with lending terms shifting heavily in favour of borrowers.
Covenants have weakened. So far this year, 57 per cent of new leveraged loans issued have been “covenant lite”4 – featuring less protection for the lender and giving more flexibility to the borrower in areas like tests on collateral, leverage, payment schedules, etc (see figure 4).
FIGURE 4: less protection for investors
Covenant lite loans as % of global leveraged loan issuance
Source: Bloomberg. Data covering period 01.01.2006 – 01.09.2018.
At the same time, leverage has climbed. The share of US leveraged buy-out (LBO) deals levered at six times or higher has gone up to nearly 50 per cent in 2017 from 30 per cent in 2013.5
Such deterioration in companies' credit profile has two potential consequences. First, it will likely lead to lower recovery rates in case of default as the weaker covenants can enable firms to issue more debt than would normally be the case. Not only does that reduce their ability to pay, but it also increases the risk a loan will be subordinated by future borrowing.
Second, it keeps companies alive for longer than may be economically viable – leading to a preponderance of businesses that do not generate enough earnings to cover interest costs. Such "zombies" account for 27 per cent of the US small caps in the Russell 2000 index, up 10 per cent from ten years ago.6
The large volume of investor cash chasing potential investment opportunities means that returns are likely to be lower, too. There was USD236 billion of dry powder in private debt funds as of end-2017 (out of USD667 billion of total AUM).7
Uncharted waters
Any asset comes with risks, and the key to successful investment is to fully understand what those risks might be. Arguably the biggest problem with private credit is that the asset class is largely untested against adverse conditions, having not yet weathered a significant default cycle. The majority of private debt funds were created well after the financial crisis.
Perhaps a bigger problem is that leveraged loans, a traditionally very illiquid asset class, are increasingly structured in vehicles with open-ended liquid structures, such as mutual funds and ETFs. While mutual funds try to manage their redemptions in a way that avoids potential mismatches between flows and the liquidity of the underlying assets, this process can only function well under “normal” market conditions. Investors in ETFs, meanwhile, do not have even this degree of protection. In the case of a major sell-off, most mutual funds allows for so-called gate provision, under which investors wishing to withdraw money join a queue and redemptions are made only gradually. For ETFs, this is not possible, but they will still need to find a buyer in order to meet redemptions, and that may only be possible by significantly lowering prices.
In case of a credit downturn, attempts to sell illiquid assets across such funds can amplify the price movements of the underlying loans. To what extent is yet to be seen.
Investors should, therefore, carefully consider their tolerance for risk. And given the impact leveraged loans can have on corporate capital structures, investors need to think carefully about any other investments they make in these companies.
Some sectors are more exposed than others. Consumer discretionary, telecoms and materials sectors in particular are strongly represented in the “covenant lite” leveraged loan market compared to their overall market capitalisation.
So, as the credit cycle enters its later stages, we are mindful of the risks to the credit market in general and to its private lending segments in particular. Those investing in this asset class should be aware that protection is weaker and returns are lower than has been the case historically. We are more upbeat on private credit funds, which have longer lockups, and better compensation for risks, than on leveraged loans. Nonetheless, we believe that the outlook for these products – as yet untested but likely to be highly correlated to other parts of the credit universe – is uncertain over a two to three-year time horizon.
About
Supriya Menon
About
Supriya Menon
Supriya Menon joined Pictet in 2012 and is a Senior Multi Asset Strategist within the Stategy Unit of the Balanced and Quantitative Investment team. Before joining Pictet, Supriya worked three years at Aviva Investors as a Macro Strategist, where she developed investment views, models and indicators to help portfolio management of Tactical Asset Allocation and Global Macro funds. From 2005 to 2009, she worked at Lehman Brothers, first as an Equity Strategist for three years and then as an Investment Analyst. She started her career as an Associate at Morgan Stanley in 1999. Supriya holds a BA (double major) in Economics and International Relations from Mount Holyoke College, Massachusetts, USA and a MBA from the Harvard Business School.
About
Andrew Cole
About
Andrew Cole
Andrew is Head of our Multi Asset London team. He joined the team as a Senior Investment Manager in 2014. Before joining Pictet Asset Management, Andrew worked at Baring Asset Management, first as a global fixed income portfolio manager and then as a multi asset portfolio manager. He previously worked at Barlow Clowes and Partners as a passive gilt fund manager. Andrew started his career in 1979 with Montague Loeble Stanley as a UK stockbroker dealing in gilt-edged securities.
This marketing document is issued by Pictet Asset Management. It is neither directed to, nor intended for distribution or use by any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of, or domiciled or located in, any locality, state, country or jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Only the latest version of the fund’s prospectus, the KIID (Key Investor Information Document), regulations, annual and semi-annual reports may be relied upon as the basis for investment decisions. These documents are available on assetmanagement.pictet.
This document is used for informational purposes only and does not constitute, on Pictet Asset Management part, an offer to buy or sell solicitation or investment advice. It has been established on the basis of data, projections, forecasts, anticipations and hypothesis which are subjective. Its analysis and conclusions are the expression of an opinion, based on available data at a specific date. The effective evolution of the economic variables and values of the financial markets could be significantly different from the indications communicated in this document.
Information, opinions and estimates contained in this document reflect a judgment at the original date of publication and are subject to change without notice. Pictet Asset Management has not taken any steps to ensure that the securities referred to in this document are suitable for any particular investor and this document is not to be relied upon in substitution for the exercise of independent judgment. Tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances of each investor and may be subject to change in the future. Before making any investment decision, investors are recommended to ascertain if this investment is suitable for them in light of their financial knowledge and experience, investment goals and financial situation, or to obtain specific advice from an industry professional.
The value and income of any of the securities or financial instruments mentioned in this document may fall as well as rise and, as a consequence, investors may receive back less than originally invested. Risk factors are listed in the fund’s prospectus and are not intended to be reproduced in full in this document.
Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future performance. Performance data does not include the commissions and fees charged at the time of subscribing for or redeeming shares. This marketing material is not intended to be a substitute for the fund’s full documentation or for any information which investors should obtain from their financial intermediaries acting in relation to their investment in the fund or funds mentioned in this document.
EU countries: the relevant entity is Pictet Asset Management (Europe) S.A., 15, avenue J. F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg
Switzerland: the relevant entity is Pictet Asset Management SA , 60 Route des Acacias – 1211 Geneva 73
Hong Kong: this material has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission or any other regulatory authority. The issuer of this material is Pictet Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited.
Singapore: this material is issued by Pictet Asset Management (Singapore) Pte Ltd. This material is intended only for institutional and accredited investors and it has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
For Australian investors, Pictet Asset Management Limited (ARBN 121 228 957) is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services license, under the Corporations Act 2001.
For US investors, Shares sold in the United States or to US Persons will only be sold in private placements to accredited investors pursuant to exemptions from SEC registration under the Section 4(2) and Regulation D private placement exemptions under the 1933 Act and qualified clients as defined under the 1940 Act. The Shares of the Pictet funds have not been registered under the 1933 Act and may not, except in transactions which do not violate United States securities laws, be directly or indirectly offered or sold in the United States or to any US Person. The Management Fund Companies of the Pictet Group will not be registered under the 1940 Act.
Pictet Asset Management Inc. (Pictet AM Inc) is responsible for effecting solicitation in North America to promote the portfolio management services of Pictet Asset Management Limited (Pictet AM Ltd) and Pictet Asset Management SA (Pictet AM SA).
In Canada Pictet AM Inc. is registered as Portfolio Manager authorised to conduct marketing activities on behalf of Pictet AM Ltd and Pictet AM SA. In the USA, Pictet AM Inc. is registered as an SEC Investment Adviser and its activities are conducted in full compliance with the SEC rules applicable to the marketing of affiliate entities as prescribed in the Adviser Act of 1940 ref. 17CFR275.206(4)-3.
This website uses cookies to enhance user navigation and to collect statistical data. To refuse the use of cookies, change your settings or for more information, please click on the following link: Cookies policy. By continuing to browse this website, you accept the use of cookies for the above purposes.
